Monthly Archives: May 2009
Comments on Pachacamac House / Longhi Architects | Arch Daily
Comments on Sand/Stone | BLDGBLOG
It is a fascinating idea and sees well thought through. The very idea of a architecture grown from the earth is fascinating and Larsson seems to have thought it through.
Comments on Frances Anderton: “Excess” Versus “Relevance” Is an Irrelevant Debate
Architecture encompasses all of the built environment, from the ordinary to the singular, and both aspects are important. By framing the debate not in a dichotomy but instead as qualities of the larger field we call our culture and environment,, an architecture for the here and now can be more easily balanced between social responsibility and artistic ambitions. Both are needed and in different mixes for different projects.
Comments on ART TO ARCHITECTURE « LEBBEUS WOODS
For my part, I hold with Deleuze and Guttari’s opinion that Art is concerned with precepts and affects and their ability. This means that Architecture is not necessarily Art, though it certainly can be and certainly the value of Art in Architecture is important. I am not one to hold that Architecture is only an Art, for Architecture includes much more than Art, both in constraints and in scope, Architecture addresses more than the limited, but very intense, subjects of Art.
Comments on Inapal Metal / Menos é mais | Arch Daily
Comments on Santo Stefano Cemetery in Italy / Amoretti + Calvi + Ranalli | Arch Daily
Comments on Richard Box | Interactive Architecture dot Org
Comments on 290 Mulberry Fabrication Update – Prototyping | CASE Design, Inc.
Comments on Plants Can Twitter for Water with New Device – PC Magazine
This is an interesting example of how everyday objects are beginning to communicate with us in a more direct manner. I hate the term ‘Smart’ technology but along those lines, what happens when all the potted plants in everyone’s houses can ask for water and tell us how they are doing?