Colors form a space, seemingly continuous and varying, much like the space of our reality. Such a space might seem easy to picture, much like a rainbow, colors seeping into each other, becoming something new and different. Yet what is the structure of such a space? Certainly there must be more than just an endless blending of colors. The questions isn’t an easy one to answer because it turns out that there are already a number of structures for giving color spatial form. In these experiments, the space of colors is explored by thinking of that space much like gravity or as a force that shapes and curves the space around it.
Continue reading Cellular Automata – The Force of Color →
How does one make decisions and judgments within the practice of architecture? There are no answers to this question, only problems. How one formulates the problem, that is constructs the problem of architecture, effects the nature of the possible solutions, the performance of the designed and constructed buildings. Problems are as much a construction of architectural practice as the actual built building is. As Kojin Karatani
describes in his book Architecture as Metaphor
, there is a tendency in western philosophy to architecturalize itself. He goes on to say that this “will to architecture” is not limited to philosophy but is latent in much of western thought, from science to the humanities.1
The will to architecture is the act of to constructing thought. It is an act of making. For any conception of architecture must include an idea of making or construction. Continue reading An Ethics of Complexity for Architecture →
System fields, intense fields and virtual fields are three interlocked concepts of the field. In his essay From Object to Field, Stan Allen primarily discusses the concept of a system field. I am using this term to describe a large group of objects that relate to each other in a systematic way and might produce emergent behaviors. An example of such a field is an ant colony as discussed by Steven Johnson in his book Emergence. In fact, a field is really just a set of relationships between objects. It can be hierarchal, unlike what Steve Allen implies, but does tend to be more of an intertwined mesh of objects, homogeneous or heterogeneous. Still a set of relationships between objects is hardly a clear way to describe a field. To be a field those relationships must be specified in a more exact manner. In fact, those relationships can not be a static “pattern” but are behavioral. The key to understanding a field is that each object inputs its behaviors, or its capacities and potentials to affect and be affected, into relation with other capacities and potentials. In a systems field the capacities are extensive properties of the objects. Examples of extensive properties are length, mass and energy. Continue reading Fields and Intensities →
Life, organic or otherwise, comes from the intensive processes of a space Manuel DeLanda refers to as the machinic phylum in his essay Non-Organic Life. His use of this term comes from the philosophy of Gilles Delueze, including Delueze’s collaborations with Felix Guattari. Delueze and Guattari tend to not use any one term when referring to their concepts, instead, like the concepts they are talking about, they fluidly interchange several different words depending on the circumstances. In the case of the machinic phylum, Delueze and Guattari also use terms such as the Body without Organs (BwO), Plane of Immanence and Plane of Consistency. DeLanda in turn, also uses the term Intensive Spatium in his book Intensive Science, Virtual Philosophy. Each of these words is like a different gateway to the same concept, thus by virtue of each term we can gain a better understanding of the concept. Continue reading The Machinic Phylum and Non-Organic Life Engines →